Cesidio Tallini's Love Signs
Back in 1970, a writer by the name of Steven Schmidt published a book
entitled Astrology 14. It
proposed revolutionising astrology in at least two ways:
- By having the beginning of the Zodiac start with the actual
constellation the Sun is transiting in at this moment on the day of the
Vernal Equinox.
- By adding two additional signs to the Zodiac, Cetus and
Ophiuchus.
According to Schmidt, this would have made Astrology more "scientific",
and a more respectable profession. Although there is nothing wrong with
having astrology reflect the heavens a little more closely, the problem
with Schmidt's approach is multi-fold.
First, astrology would still be considered a pseudo-science by most
astronomers even with Schmidt's reforms, because most astronomers don't
believe the positions of the planets at the moment of one's birth have
anything to do with one's personality, or one's destiny; in other
words, the assumption that astronomers don't consider astrology
scientific is correct, but Schmidt fails to understand the real source
of the problem.
Second, the Sun at the Vernal Equinox does not start at
Zero Degrees in the
constellation of Pisces if we really want to get
technical about the precession of the equinoxes, but Schmidt's approach
ignores that reality entirely.
Third, the length of the constellations
is not equal like the length of the astrological signs.
Fourth, an
astrological sign is not the same thing as an astronomical
constellation.
Fifth, the ecliptic, which is the only thing that
matters in astrology (even the latitude North or South of the ecliptic
doesn't matter in astrology), strictly speaking crosses 13
constellations now, not 14.
Sixth, the ecliptic will cross a 14th
constellation in a century or so, but that constellation is not Cetus,
but Orion.
Seventh, it is true that astrology once had 10 signs, two
less signs than the current 12, so expanding the Zodiac to 14 signs
does makes sense given that the ecliptic already crosses 13
constellations; however, Orion is not only a more correct 14th
constellation, but it also happens to be opposite to Ophiuchus, and
this makes the transition from 12-sign astrology to 14-sign astrology
much easier and straightforward.
Essentially there is nothing wrong with reforming astrology in order to
reflect the heavens a little more closely, but Schmidt's approach
literally
throws real astrology out, and replaces it with hocus pocus astronomy
without a meaning. These are the reasons why I believe Bucksfanian
astrology is superior to Schmidt's Astrology 14.
In Bucksfanian astrology the Zodiac still starts with Aries, and the
sign of Aries still has its traditional First House meaning. Schmidt's
Astrology 14, on the other hand, makes Pisces the first sign, and the
First House as well. This is needlessly confusing, and turns wholesome
tropical astrology into a nightmarish and bad sideral astrology. I'm
not surprised if Schmidt's proposed reforms never caught on.
Also, Bucksfanian astrology starts including some celestial bodies
other than the Sun, the Moon, and the planets, and these inclusions,
while original, are not without rationality under an astrological
perspective. Bucksfanian astrology eliminates the dual rulership of
Venus in Taurus, as well as the dual rulership of Mercury in Virgo, and
makes the asteroids of Ceres and Vesta the new rulers of Taurus and
Virgo. Also, the additional signs of Bucksfanian astrology, i.e. Orion
and Ophiuchus, have unique rulers in Pallas and Chiron. This makes
astrology richer, and actually more accurate in an interpretive point
of view!
Recently another two revolutions took place in Bucksfanian astrology. I
was able to discover some signs where the planets are in exaltation, or
the sign in which the influence of a particular planet is very strong,
but I soon discovered that while the old Ptolemaic rules of planetary
exaltation were useful as a starting point, following the traditional
planets of exaltation and fall leads to nothing more than a big and
senseless gobbledegook.
The new Bucksfanian Dignities and Debilities curiously point to some
traditional Ptolemaic planets in exaltation, but Bucksfanian Dignities
and Debilities were created by following a very specific rule! Through
this rule, if you know where a planet is in dignity, you also know
where it is in exaltation, by simple mathematics! The sign where a
planet falls can also be established by simple mathematics! Here are
the fully reformed Bucksfanian Dignities and Debilities:
| Bucksfanian Dignities & Debilities |
| Zodiac Sign |
Dignity |
Exaltation |
Detriment |
Fall |
| Capricorn |
Saturn |
Mars |
Moon |
Venus |
| Aquarius |
Uranus |
Ceres |
Sun |
Pluto |
| Pisces |
Neptune |
Pallas |
Vesta |
Chiron |
| Aries |
Mars |
Mercury |
Venus |
Jupiter |
| Taurus |
Ceres |
Moon |
Pluto |
Saturn |
| Orion |
Pallas |
Sun |
Chiron |
Uranus |
| Gemini |
Mercury |
Vesta |
Jupiter |
Neptune |
| Cancer |
Moon |
Venus |
Saturn |
Mars |
| Leo |
Sun |
Pluto |
Uranus |
Ceres |
| Virgo |
Vesta |
Chiron |
Neptune |
Pallas |
| Libra |
Venus |
Jupiter |
Mars |
Mercury |
| Scorpio |
Pluto |
Saturn |
Ceres |
Moon |
| Ophiuchus |
Chiron |
Uranus |
Pallas |
Sun |
| Sagittarius |
Jupiter |
Neptune |
Mercury |
Vesta |
The second revolution that took place recently is much more fun and
interesting to the average person. You've heard about Linda Goodman's
Love Signs, but do you know what Cesidio Tallini's Love Signs looks
like? You can see them below.
| Bucksfanian Sun Sign Compatibility1 |
| Zodiac Sign |
Begins |
Ends |
Compatibility With |
| Capricorn |
01/01 |
26/01 |
Capricorn, Pisces, Taurus, Virgo, Ophiuchus |
| Aquarius |
27/01 |
21/02 |
Aquarius, Aries, Orion, Libra, Sagittarius |
| Pisces |
22/02 |
19/03 |
Pisces, Taurus, Gemini, Scorpio, Capricorn |
| Aries |
20/03 |
14/04 |
Aries, Orion, Cancer, Ophiuchus, Aquarius |
| Taurus |
15/04 |
10/05 |
Taurus, Gemini, Leo, Sagittarius, Pisces |
| Orion |
11/05 |
05/06 |
Orion, Cancer, Virgo, Capricorn, Aries |
| Gemini |
06/06 |
01/07 |
Gemini, Leo, Libra, Aquarius, Taurus |
| Cancer |
02/07 |
27/07 |
Cancer, Virgo, Scorpio, Pisces, Orion |
| Leo |
28/07 |
22/08 |
Leo, Libra, Ophiuchus, Aries, Gemini |
| Virgo |
23/08 |
17/09 |
Virgo, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Taurus, Cancer |
| Libra |
18/09 |
13/10 |
Libra, Ophiuchus, Capricorn, Orion, Leo |
| Scorpio |
14/10 |
08/11 |
Scorpio, Sagittarius, Aquarius, Gemini, Virgo |
| Ophiuchus |
09/11 |
04/12 |
Ophiuchus, Capricorn, Pisces, Cancer, Libra |
| Sagittarius |
05/12 |
31/12 |
Sagittarius, Aquarius, Aries, Leo, Scorpio |
References and Notes
- If you were born a few days before the end of a Bucksfanian
sign, consider the next sign of the Bucksfanian Zodiac compatible with
yourself along with your own Sun sign, and consider also the compatible
signs to the next sign as compatible with yourself in relationships.
E.g., if you are a Taurus born a day or two before the sign of Orion,
consider both Taurus and Orion as compatible signs, as well as the
signs of Cancer, Virgo, Capricorn, and Aries. Also, do not confuse the
traditional Sun sign of a person with their Bucksfanian Sun sign, which
may be different in many cases. The rules above are general rules of
compatibility; they are based essentially on conjunctions, trines, and
septiles with the sign in question. However, the position of the Moon
and the other planets in the Bucksfanian Zodiac will also have a strong
influence on who you are attracted to, and who you enjoy spending your
time with.